|
::: COMMUNICATION is fundamental but ... by Franco Cesaro
-----------------------------------------------------------
We’re living in an
age of
communication diseducation.
Although
communication is
essential for human
survival, we’ve
forgotten the basic
rules. We’ve got to
start remembering
these rules again.
For too many years I’ve had to take part
in or describe training courses that promise
to teach or persuade others to do
what we want them to do.
Similar expectations are raised particularly in
sales personnel, who are led to believe that
there are innovative and strategic techniques
and psychologies that can convince others
to buy or behave favorably to our will.
Then I remembered my daughters, who even
as infants were capable of persuading with just
a mere whimper (or often even just a moan,
pout or gesture of the hand) an army of grandmothers,
aunts, mothers, and baby sitters to
do exactly whatever they had in mind: eat,
drink, play, get picked up, get taken outside
for a walk, whatever - and they couldn’t even talk! They could only whine, gesture, smile,
and so on. In short, they had mastered a form
of communication that was very efficacious
and very persuasive.
They had obviously never attended a training
course. Mother Nature had provided them like
all children with sufficient communication
for survival and growth without any special talent
or skill.
Communication is therefore fundamental for
human survival; usually, however, we communicate
our needs and opinions through words.
Yet all of us have experienced difficulties in
communicating at some point in our lives: at
school, at work, at home, and every day we
encounter problems further upstream and often
far from our current personal situation.
We are currently living in an age of complete
communication diseducation in which we are
accustomed to the transfer of information “in
pills”, in which we are atoms colonized by television,
and in which we are accustomed only
to receiving and not replying.
Moreover, if communication is an exchange
between at least two people, then some form
of relationship must necessarily be established.
There is a complete lack of relationship in today’s
communication, however, and therefore
no reciprocal respect.
In centuries of culture we have unconsciously
learned how to formulate speech.
Unfortunately, this basic know-how is disappearing
because we are constantly exposed to
an incorrect use of communication and unaware of its rules.
How can we improve the way we communicate
using words?
Verbal communication uses empathy to transmit
the importance of words to others.
An orator, for example, must know precisely
when the audience is approaching the limit to
its attention span. In order to do this, the orator
must be first of all a good observer.
Written communication is different: although
the same relationship based on empathy can
obviously not be established, there are other
ways to personalize the communication plan.
They had already invented
everything
::: Why reflect on Rhetoric?
Man is a creator of worlds, an animal without
shape. The form he gives himself through human
expression and communication is therefore
complex and linked to the fact that we are
all different, unique, and unrepeatable.
If we wish to persuade others – using expression
in its authentic, positive meaning - we
must necessarily obey rules. Knowing the rules
that lie at the basis of verbal communication
lets us redevelop certain experiences and
improve our communication skills.
Reflecting on why we communicate in certain unaways,
we can formulate general rules.
Lastly, taking the rules of rhetoric as reference,
we can capture the attention of others and
seek support in other tools as well, provided
that we use them always with precise criteria.
Rhetoric, in fact, is a precise and complex strategy
for human communication.
::: Premise
Rhetoric is the science of generating and
comprehending the text through the identification
of rules that lie at its base of its
construction. Although it is anything but straightforward,
it revolves around the art of speaking
to the public. Defined by the Ancients as
the art of persuasion through the use of
linguistic tools, rhetoric today is confused with
the term Public Speaking, which takes
the roots of its more modern techniques for
“speaking in public to the public” from the elder
art. What we must understand is that today’s
communication proposals are inspired
by this original configuration and also implies
an academic vision that cannot be abandoned.
We will now review the steps in the development
of one of the world’s oldest disciplines
regarding human expression by putting certain
things already learnt by intuition into proper
order.
::: The evolution of rhetoric: a bit of history…
Linguistic expression was preceded by figurative
depiction, the artistic representation of figures
or scenes.
This was followed by the sacred or juridical use
of the written word that spread wider and wider
before the miracle that occurred in the 6th-
5th Century B.C.: the “discovery” of the importance
of verbal communication.
One of the most significant sites of the phenomenon
was the Magna Grecia region, given
that one of the distinctive features of ancient
Greek culture was the dominance of oral over
written communication (unlike the Judeo-Christian
and Moslem cultures known as “peoples
of the book”, the Bible and the Koran). Experts
say that the initiator of the process was Gorgia
of Lentini, a native of Sicily who came to Athens
in the days of the Sophists (sofia = knowledge),
an itinerant band of masters of eloquence.
The Sophist School had remarkable success
in Athens and was favored by the sociopolitical
environment. Athens was, in fact, the
sole example of democracy in the ancient
world, and its dialogue, comparison, and debate all promoted a system of relationships
that led to the development of the Athenians’
great specialty: the art of persuasion.
The word is the sound of our soul…
::: Persuasion is like a song: the beat is
everything
Persuasion is fundamentally pragmatic: this art
and science structures speech with a precise
technique that convinces others to change
their ideas and/or behavior through the use
of elements that apply leverage to the emotions
(from the Latin verb e-movére).
Although there is no special attention on presenting
the truth, one’s speech must possess
a certain degree of verisimilitude in order to
achieve the results desired for the political-judiciary
purposes. This is a practical use of the
word that serves the purpose of one’s line of
reasoning.
The art of eloquence is like modulating a musical
harmony using three styles - humble, median,
and sublime – to the pleasure of the listener.
The orator’s mortal sin is to bore…
::: Counterpoint from the philosophers
Eloquence and persuasion have been used to
great effect by philosophers in the exercise of
their profession: some of the most famous
examples can help us better understand certain
questions and the different ways to express
ourselves in public.
Socrates is the father of philosophy based on
men (prior to him, all philosophy was naturalistic,
a search for a unifying principle in nature).
We must thank Socrates for the development
of the first theoretical philosophical systems.
Socrates helped men envision truth
through a maieutic system; a concept further
developed by Saint Augustine, who held that
truth is inside Man.
The objective of his research was the truth and
his speech was organized to assert solid topics
in order to convince others: this is the
denotative use of the word, speaking in neutral,
conventional way to better present the
contents of a given expression or situation.
Plato wrote his dialogues as if his characters
were speaking to us in order to grant greater
priority to the spoken word than the written word. Plato stood in clear opposition to
the Sophists, and expressed an the enormous
need to establish solid and unquestionable values
for political ends.
Aristotle attempted to reach an intermediate
position between Socrates and Plato: a great
arbitrator in all fields, he maintained an open
mind in all questions.
All three were masters of the art of rhetoric.
::: From the Roman Empire to modern times
Over the following centuries, the art of persuasion
“migrated” to Rome where Cicero and
Quintilian swayed the crowds, but the fragile
soil in which rhetoric had first flourished (democracy)
began to dry out and its traditions
withered because space for free confrontation
had disappeared. Rhetoric was used more and
more for panegyric (intentionally exaggerated
to laud a patron’s glories and virtues) and in
the early Christian era was finally transformed
into the preacher’s homily. The rhetorical tradition
flourished anew in 17th century Baroque
society (setting is important in linguistic terms
as well) and continues even in modern times
where, with all it ups and downs, we are currently
witnessing a renewal of the tradition
through various applications in commerce,
economic, politics, advertising, and entertainment.
It even seems, in fact, that an effort is
being made to “sublimate” the mediocrity of
existence through a more correct and artistic
use of the word.
::: Rhetorical speech: the right technique to
employ
Accepting that the task of rhetoric is persuasion, there are three different types of rhetorical
speech:
• deliberative: which tends to differentiate
between what is useful and what is harmful;
this approaches a political use of speech;
• judiciary: like the defending counsel’s final
harangue that hopes to sway the judge’s
verdict using logical reasoning that is also often
emotive, underling the human aspect of
the story;
• demonstrative: which tends to differentiate
between what is beautiful and what is ugly,
or in other words, an address that lauds a man’s
qualities and virtues through a panegyric.
::: Construction of rhetorical speech
Rhetorical speech is constructed through five
fundamental moments that are authentic “oral”
sales techniques. Try to imagine each point of
rhetorical speech as a new sales pitch. You’ll
be surprised.
Invention = the search for topics (establishment
of the format) and construction
of the mental map. The construction
of speech resembles a Chinese box-within-another-
box system. This step is the biggest container;
similarly, it is well worth remembering
that writers write their books with the last page
in mind right from the start.
Disposition = the organization of conceptual
reasoning. In this phase, we pose a
series of emotively efficacious questions with
respect for a precise sequence:
• the beginning of a speech (OUTSET);
• where and how to position the topics (NARRATION),
the telling of facts and experiences;
• what purpose they serve (REASONING) and
the advantages derived;
• the end (CONCLUSION), in the sense of providing
listeners with practical information and
suggestions for behavior.
Elocution = is the way to present reasoning
through the use of rhetorical figures. Oratory
power is linked to the use of such figures, which
are many in number. Although I illustrate only
a few below, I advise everyone to read a book
or conduct a search in Internet in order to
acquire a greater understanding of the many
different ways speech can be enriched without
banality. Examples:
• Allegory, e.g.: Giovanni Pascoli when he
speaks of “…the crooked little horse that carried
away he who would never return...”
• Irony, the application of comic diction to
tragic situations or for the greater emphasis of
limits;
• Metaphor;
• Metonym. For example: I earn my daily
bread by the sweat of my brow;
• Climax.
Memory = no orator reads his text – it would
be awkward. Neither do great lawyers read
their harangues. A good memory is fundamental,
however, no large audience can be faced
without one. Everyone must take careful stock
of their own characteristics and train hard to
the best of their ability.
Pronunciation = is the ability to persuade
by modulating one’s voice with excellent diction,
and regards characteristics of non-verbal
communication in which tone of voice, rhythm,
speed, and pitch are all important. Speech is
all the more convincing when we bring our
words to a clear ending and when we speak
with evident pauses in clearly punctuated phrases.
::: The importance of silence, and not only for
listening
Although the fundamental tool we use to communicate
is the word, silences and pauses also
play an important role. Being afraid of silence,
or in other words, the inability to express
oneself, is a refusal of silence (but not in
the sense of preferring the babble that surrounds
us today), while forgetting that the
most important things all happen in silence:
conversions, the most beautiful moments, even
our strongest experiences.
What is silence? What do we mean by silence?
All this brings us back to our emotions that keep
us constant company and never leave us
alone.
How do we feel, what do we experience
when we are required to speak in public?
For some people speaking in public - even in
front of just one person alone - is a pleasure,
a natural gesture, or sometimes even a need.
Although motivation and content obviously
change when the roles of the interlocutors
change, as in all disciplines, once you learn
and assimilate a few rules and keep yourself
in practice, you’ll always able to handle even
the most challenging situation.
Some people experience more anxiety than
others whenever they have to improvise in
stressing or fatiguing situations. Preparing yourself
well for the encounter, checking your own motivations and those of others, and attentively
listening and watching the others with
participation all help ensure good results for
your eloquence.
::: The therapeutic value of the word
This magical property was hypothesized by Antiphon
and has perennially attracted the attention
of the world’s great thinkers, including
Freud: it is the rationalization and expression
in linguistic terms of what has been removed
that cures us.
We’re symbolic creatures, and our type of linguistic
expression is one reflection of our interior
order. Human beings need to impose
order over disorder: mathematics and law are
only two of the disciplines with which Man
achieves to impose order.
Just how does the word heal? Why do we sicken
from words unspoken and emotions unexpressed?
Learning how to speak with others in orderly
fashion helps us feel more self-assured and better
about ourselves, and clarifies our ideas.
::: Gender difference in communication
We must never forget that men and women
reason and communicate in different ways:
men adopt more linear reasoning, for example;
women think in more complete and more
complex terms of mosaic.
Women speak to establish and cultivate relationships.
Men usually speak to achieve objectives,
accomplish things, and feel useful.
Learning to respect these differences will help
you communicate more effectively.
::: BIBLIOGRAPHY
Abbé Dinouart, "L'art de se taire" [1771], Grenoble, éd. Jérôme Millon, 1996.
Quadrio A., Venini L., “La comunicazione nei processi sociali e organizzativi”,
Franco Angeli, 2000.
H. Gardner, “Changing Minds”, Harvard Business School Press, 2004.
Wilde O., “The Picture of Dorian Gray” [1891], Penguin Classic.
Gray John, “Men Are from Mars, Women Are from Venus”, Harper Collins,
1992.
::: FILMOGRAPHY
A few good men, director Rob Reiner, USA 1992.
Man of the Year, director Barry Levinson, USA 2006.
|
|